施用不同液体硅肥对沿江水稻生长性状的影响
作者: 刘龙 王家宝 孙义祥
摘要 以徽两优粤禾丝苗为试验材料,采用大田试验的方式,探究3种液体硅肥对水稻生长及抗倒伏性状的影响,以期为沿江稻作区水稻绿色高效生产提供新的技术途径。结果表明,喷施液体硅肥可以显著提高孕穗期水稻剑叶面积,提升幅度为13.1%~24.6%,喷施液体硅肥A、C可以显著提高齐穗期水稻剑叶面积,提升幅度分别达9.4%和19.6%;喷施液体硅肥B可以显著增加分蘖盛期水稻分蘖数,但对齐穗期水稻分蘖数增加不显著,喷施液体硅肥C在齐穗期分蘖数可增加26.9%,且达显著差异;齐穗期、收获期喷施液体硅肥C均能显著增加水稻单穴根鲜重,且增加幅度高于A和B;抽穗期喷施液体硅肥C处理SPAD值最高,比CK高10.2%,差异显著;喷施液体硅肥A、C可显著降低杨花期水稻的倒伏指数,提高水稻抗倒伏能力;喷施液体硅肥B、C可以显著提高水稻有效穗数,提升幅度为58%、9.4%;各处理每穗实粒数差异不显著;喷施液体硅肥B处理千粒重最低;喷施液体硅肥C可以显著增加水稻产量,增产幅度为14.3%。综合不同生育期水稻各生长指标及产量等因素,在沿江水稻产区,分别于水稻拔节期、抽穗期、灌浆期喷施液体硅肥C,对促进水稻生长、增加水稻产量及抗倒伏能力最强,是较佳的液体硅肥品种。
关键词 水稻;液体硅肥;倒伏指数;产量;产量构成因子
中图分类号 S 143.7+1 文献标识码 A 文章编号 0517-6611(2025)01-0137-04
doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2025.01.028
开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID):
Effect of Applying Different Liquid Silicon Fertilizers on the Growth Character of Rice Along the Yangtze River
LIU Long WANG Jia-bao SUN Yi-xiang 2
(1.Hexian Agricultural Technical Service Center,Hexian,Anhui 238200; 2.Institute of Soil and Fertilizer,Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hefei,Anhui 230031)
Abstract Taking rice variety Huiliangyouyuehesimiao as experimental materials,field experiments were conducted to explore the effects of three types of liquid silicon fertilizers on rice growth and lodging resistance traits,in order to provide a new technological approach for green and efficient rice production in the rice growing areas of the Yangtze River Basin.The results indicated that spraying liquid silicon fertilizer could significantly increase the sword leaf area of rice during the booting stage,with an increase range of 13.1% to 24.6%.Spraying liquid silicon fertilizer A and C could significantly increase the sword leaf area of rice during the full heading stage,with an increase range of 9.4% and 196%,respectively;spraying liquid silicon fertilizer B could significantly increase the tillering number of rice during the peak tillering stage,but it was not significant for the increase in tillering number of rice during the full heading stage.Spraying liquid silicon fertilizer C could increase the tillering number by 26.9% during the full heading stage and achieve a significant difference;spraying liquid silicon fertilizer C during the heading and harvesting stages would significantly increase the fresh weight of single hole roots in rice,and the increase was higher than that of A and B;the treatment of spraying liquid silicon fertilizer C during the heading stage had the highest SPAD value,which was 10.2% higher than CK,and the difference was significant;spraying liquid silicon fertilizers A and C could significantly reduce the lodging index of rice during the poplar flowering period and improve its lodging resistance;spraying liquid silicon fertilizers B and C could significantly increase the effective panicle number of rice,with an increase of 5.8% and 9.4% respectively;there was no significant difference in the number of grains per spike among the treatments;the treatment of spraying liquid silicon fertilizer B had the lowest thousand grain weight;spraying liquid silicon fertilizer C could significantly increase rice yield,with a yield increase of 14.3%.Taking into account various growth indicators and yield factors of rice at different growth stages,this study showed that spraying liquid silicon fertilizer C during the jointing,heading,and filling stages of rice in the rice growing areas along the Yangtze River had the strongest effect on promoting rice growth,increasing rice yield,and resisting lodging,making it the best foliar fertilizer variety.
Key words Rice;Liquid silicon fertilizer;Lodging index;Yield;Yield component factors
基金项目 安徽省水稻产业技术体系项目。
作者简介 刘龙(1983—),男,安徽怀远人,高级农艺师,硕士,从事土壤肥料与农业新技术推广等工作。*通信作者,研究员,博士,从事作物养分管理与资源高效利用研究。
长江流域是我国最主要的水稻产区之一,实现该区域的水稻高产高效对保障国家粮食安全至关重要。作为粮食的“粮食”,施肥是作物高产的重要保证[1]。但随着近年来育种、栽培技术的不断提高,水稻单产大幅度提升的同时,水稻需肥量大、耐肥性增强所引起的肥料利用率低、环境风险增加等问题也日益凸显,且在一些低温或者存在土壤障碍因子的地区,根系对养分的吸收会受到一定的抑制,进而影响水稻生长[2-4]。叶面喷施液体肥料应用于农业的历史悠久,它是通过控制一定的参数和工艺制成易溶的含有作物生长所需营养的产品,将其喷施于叶面,可以发挥出一定的肥效[5]。与土壤施肥相比,叶面肥具有养分吸收快、利用效率高和针对性强等特点。
水稻是最典型的喜硅作物之一,其植株体内硅素含量可达20%以上[6]。随着现代农业研究的深入,硅已被公认为是许多作物尤其是禾本科作物的主要功能性营养物质,在农作物的生长发育中发挥重要作用,叶面喷施液体硅肥是补充硅元素主要方式之一[7]。研究表明,叶面喷施硅肥可以显著增加水稻叶面积指数、根长、根冠比等,从而增加水稻产量[8]。另外,叶面喷施硅肥可限制蒸腾作用、保护细胞膜、增加抗氧化酶活性,提高作物抗旱性。
前人在水稻叶面喷施硅肥方面已经做了较多的工作,但对于喷施时期和次数的研究则不尽相同。秦猛等[9]以粳稻品种为研究对象,分别在水稻拔节期、齐穗期、齐穗期后10、20 d喷施4次叶面硅肥可以显著增加水稻产量及品质。而刘陈晨等[10]则仅在水稻孕穗期喷施一次含硅叶面肥即可达到显著增加水稻产量的效果。荆培培等[11]在水稻生长期喷施1次和2次单硅酸螯合硅叶面肥均有较好的增产效果。故在水稻生产中,叶面肥喷施硅肥时期及次数较为灵活,且对合理施用叶面硅肥能促进和改善水稻生长状况的结论基本得到公认。
这些研究集中在叶面硅肥对水稻产量、农艺性状等的影响,而针对沿江稻区喷施液体硅肥对上述指标以及水稻抗逆性,特别是抗倒伏的研究鲜见报道。为此,笔者以沿江稻区为研究区域,分别于水稻拔节、抽穗期、灌浆期喷施3种不同液体硅肥,探索不同液体硅肥对水稻生长及抗倒伏能力的影响,以期为沿江稻作区水稻绿色高效生产提供新的技术途径。
1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
水稻品种选择徽两优粤禾丝苗,属籼型两系杂交水稻,由安徽台沃农业科技有限公司、安徽省农业科学院水稻研究所、广东省农业科学院水稻研究所共同选育。
供试液体硅肥由正规厂家生产,从市场购买所得,分别为含硅液体肥A、B、C 3种。水稻基肥采用侧深施肥方式,插秧时随侧深施肥机施入,选用配方为26-9-13的缓释型配方肥,由市场购买所得。
1.2 试验地概况
试验于2023年6—10月在安徽省和县功桥镇进行,该区域属我国长江中下游植稻区,以稻-油种植模式为主。试验地土壤类型为潴育型水稻土,地势平坦,肥力均匀,田间沟渠配套齐全。0~20 cm耕层土壤的基本理化性质:pH 6. 有效磷13.5 mg/kg,速效钾203.6mg/kg,有机质21.7 g/kg,全氮1.33 g/kg。
1.3 试验设计
共设置4个处理,每个处理面积667 m 3次重复,条带状排列。小区之间修埂隔开。所有处理水稻采用机械侧深施肥方式,基肥施用控释肥(28-9-13,600 kg/hm2),后期不再进行土壤追肥。插秧密度为30 cm×16 cm。分别于水稻拔节期、抽穗期、灌浆期喷施试验产品A、B、C。具体喷施方法:每个处理用量筒量取产品50 mL,对水25 L,充分混匀,采用背负式喷雾器均匀喷施,同时设喷施清水处理CK。
1.4 测定项目与方法
1.4.1 剑叶面积。分别于孕穗期、齐穗期每个处理选取3个采样点,每个采样点选取5株长势中等且一致的水稻测定剑叶长宽,计算剑叶面积。
剑叶面积(cm2)=剑叶长(cm)×剑叶宽(cm)×0.8
1.4.2 倒伏指数。分别于孕穗期、扬花期每个处理选取3个采样点,每个采样点选取5株长势中等且一致的水稻,采用茎秆测定仪测定水稻第二节间抗压强度(N),以及水稻单径鲜重(g),采用手指平衡法测定水稻茎秆重心高度(cm),进而计算水稻倒伏指数。
倒伏指数=单茎鲜重(g)×茎秆重心高度(cm)/第二节间抗折力(N)
1.4.3 水稻产量及其构成因素。各处理水稻单打单收,人工脱粒,测定实产,并根据实际含水量,全部折算为135%含水量作为水稻最终产量。在水稻成熟期,各处理选取3个采样点,每个采样点选取1 m2有代表性且长势一致的植株样,实验室常规考种,测定有效穗数、穗实粒数和千粒重。
1.4.4 其余指标。分别于分蘖盛期、齐穗期每处理定点观测连续10穴长势中等且一致水稻分蘖数;分别于齐穗期、收获期每处理连根挖掘10穴长势中等且一致的水稻,测定根鲜重;分别于拔节期、孕穗期、抽穗期选取10穴长势中等且一致的水稻,采用叶绿素测量仪(SPAD-50 日本产)测定SPAD值。